NAHB is arguing that HUD’s guidelines are not regulations and only the statute — which never mentions “primary”entrances — establishes legally binding requirements for accessibility.
NAHB is also arguing that since the design in question complies with several of HUD’s safe harbor documents, and was built to a state building code specifically designed to meet the requirements of the Fair Housing Act, that the Department of Justice’s position on enforcement is contrary to HUD’s policy of encouraging flexibility and alternative designs.
The Fair Housing Act’s accessibility provisions require all multifamily dwellings constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to be built with seven design features to make them accessible to persons with disabilities.
The case is on appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
For further information, e-mail Bruce Lundegren, NAHB's regulatory counsel, or call him at 800-368-5242 x8305.
[ Go to Top ]