Week of August 28, 2006
Front Page
Coast to Coast
Housing Forum
Politics & Government
Economics & Finance
Tips
Business Management
Multifamily
Building Systems
Education
Green Building
Katrina Recovery
Legal
International
Workforce housing
Labor
Building Products
TV
Endowment
Association News
Pact Sets Builders Searching for New Lumber Sources

Survey Finds NIMBYs on the Rise in Both U.S. and Britain

Ongoing survey research in the U.S. and United Kingdom by Saint Consulting Group finds that rising opposition to real estate development “will make it tougher — on both sides of the Atlantic — for developers and also politicians who run for election on pro-growth land-use issues,” according to Michael Saint, CEO of the consulting firm.

U.S. builders have an advantage over their U.K. counterparts because only 13% of the 1,000 Americans who were polled oppose new housing, compared to 33% of the same number of Britains. In fact, 75% of the Americans said they would support single-family housing in their communities, the highest amount of support for any kind of development.

One in five home owners in both countries appears willing to fight to protect the character of their communities and the value of their investment in their homes. Fox called this “an eye-opening discovery, even for me.” In the U.K., 19% of those surveyed reported opposing a planning application, compared to 21% in the U.S. survey.

“The development industry clearly has not paid enough heed to finding community support for its proposals,” said Nick Keable, Saint Consulting’s vice president of U.K. operations.

“In the U.K., residential development pressure is intense. Only 12% of Britain has actually ever been developed,” he said. “The rest is either undevelopable or protected. While this proportion gives the U.K. a special character, the dearth exacerbates the situation and creates incredibly high land values. That’s why residential development is such an issue and the government’s theoretically pro-development stance is seriously unpopular.”

Less encouraging news for American home builders, U.S. survey respondents turn out to be more cynical about the process and politics of development, with 70% believing that the relationships between elected officials and developers make the approval process unfair, compared to 50% of those surveyed in Great Britain.

Going into last May 4th’s local elections, 72% of British respondents felt that a candidate’s position on growth and development was “critical” to how they would cast their vote. Facing elections on Nov. 7, 93% of the Americans felt similarly.

“Candidates for office are forewarned,” said Fox, a veteran political campaign advisor. “All land use has become highly politicized and adversarial. And it is going to get worse.”

Types of development opposed by Americans were:

  • Waste/landfills, 82%
  • Casinos, 80%
  • Power plants, 66%
  • Quarries, 63%
  • Wal-Mart, 63%
  • Retail, 62%
  • Apartments, 48%
  • Offices, 47%
  • Supermarkets, 33%
  • Single-family housing, 13%


For a previous NBN story on findings from the American survey, click here.

 
NBN Tools
Print This Article Subscribe to NBN
E-mail Editor Print ALL Articles Manage Your Subscription

   
 
The GSEs and Housing Affordability: A Necessary But Not Sufficient Condition
Freddie Mac Keeps America's Eggonomy Stable. Enroll In Eggonomics 101
 
   
 
Find and manage projects right from your desktop.
Get your company listed in the new McGraw-Hill Construction Directory.
 
   
 
Custom Builder Symposium - Oct. 27-29
Building Systems Councils Showcase - Nov. 5-8
State & Local Government Affairs Conference - Nov. 9-11