|
For example, consider a situation where a county enacts a regulation to increase minimum lot sizes. That regulation consequently drives-up housing costs and unintentionally prevents classes of minorities from buying homes. The county most likely did not intend to discriminate racially when it passed its minimum lot size requirement. However, in most judicial circuits, that defense would not be successful insofar as the FHA is concerned — because it is the effect of government action that matters.
It is important to understand that the FHA is not an affordable housing statute. Congress passed the FHA with a specific purpose: to eliminate housing practices that discriminate against minorities and other groups. Nonetheless, the FHA should make government bodies think carefully when they raise barriers to multifamily and other high-density projects. Where statistics, demographics and other evidence show that government actions have created racially segregated housing patterns — or have effectively denied minorities access to affordable housing — the FHA should cause land use regulators to take a second look at the consequences of their actions.
If you have questions for Ask the Lawyer, click here.
There is no guarantee that your question will be answered in this format, so if you have a particular legal concern that requires immediate attention, contact the NAHB Legal Research Service at 800-368-5242 x8491.
This information is provided as a service of the NAHB Legal Action Committee and NAHB Building Products Issues Committee. The information is intended to familiarize you with the law in this area. It is not intended to be an exhaustive presentation of legal information on this particular subject, and in no way constitutes an opinion of law. Your own attorney must review this information to determine how it may apply to your particular situation.
|